Feb. 28th, 2001 01:40 pm
RIAA and Napster
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
andysocialThose silly silly people running the music "industry" (like there are factories and stuff?) just can't figure out how to not blow themselves up. Napster offered them 200 million dollars per year for the next 5 years, if the RIAA would just not try to destroy Napster, and maybe even try to play nice with them.
The RIAA, being the old greybeards they are, couldn't bring themselves to approve such a scheme, so they'll probably end up winning the court battle and shutting Napster down. Of course, since Fanning and Co. have a deal with BMG records, they'll stick around as the front end for ONE record company's electronic distribution system.
Meanwhile, the other companies in the RIAA are working on their own systems, which they'll probably screw up royally. Anyone else remember the awesome Personics systems from the 80s? You could go to a record store kiosk, choose your personal favorite songs from the playlist, and have a cassette created with only music you wanted, with a nice laser-printed jacket and labels. The record companies made royalties, and the consumer got a product they truly wanted. Of course, the industry let that system die from lack of attention, and it was too late anyway, with the CD revolution in full swing.
This past week, the RIAA started going after OpenNap servers, which are equivalent to Napster, but without any company to sue. Next, I'm sure they'll attempt to sue the users of Gnutella, who are individuals operating out of their own homes. This is basically the music companies suing their own customers. I wonder how they justify that business model.
Really should have made that deal with Napster, RIAA. It was the best chance of getting any money at all without suing your own customers. This should be an entertaining year.
The RIAA, being the old greybeards they are, couldn't bring themselves to approve such a scheme, so they'll probably end up winning the court battle and shutting Napster down. Of course, since Fanning and Co. have a deal with BMG records, they'll stick around as the front end for ONE record company's electronic distribution system.
Meanwhile, the other companies in the RIAA are working on their own systems, which they'll probably screw up royally. Anyone else remember the awesome Personics systems from the 80s? You could go to a record store kiosk, choose your personal favorite songs from the playlist, and have a cassette created with only music you wanted, with a nice laser-printed jacket and labels. The record companies made royalties, and the consumer got a product they truly wanted. Of course, the industry let that system die from lack of attention, and it was too late anyway, with the CD revolution in full swing.
This past week, the RIAA started going after OpenNap servers, which are equivalent to Napster, but without any company to sue. Next, I'm sure they'll attempt to sue the users of Gnutella, who are individuals operating out of their own homes. This is basically the music companies suing their own customers. I wonder how they justify that business model.
Really should have made that deal with Napster, RIAA. It was the best chance of getting any money at all without suing your own customers. This should be an entertaining year.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Its not them that is amusing. Its all the pathetic little geeks and losers who continue to take these people seriously, salivate over their so called music and maintain in wealth those who are so obviously contemptuous of them and who regard them as lower than dog turds. Why are people still buying their records and going to their concerts? Why haven't the "fans" seen what scum and whores their music idols are?
I'm amazed at an entire generation of people who are such supine wimps eager to bend over and take it up the ass.
no subject