andysocial: (Default)
[personal profile] andysocial
Although the headline says that Rudolph reveals his motives, it really doesn't shed much light on things. How does attacking an abortion clinic strike a blow against the government? How does killing adults make you "pro-life" in any way? As Bill Hicks said, "It's a basic kind of irony. Pro-lifers killing people." And the Olympics? How is that going to shame the U.S. for its legalization of abortion?

For that matter, wouldn't a protest against the legalization of abortion have made a lot more sense if it was sometime earlier than 1996? Roe v Wade was in 1973, dude!

Comment and see full formatting

Tags:
Date: 2005-04-14 05:26 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] kaylee.livejournal.com
My whole outlook on Rudolph.....

He had choices to chose guilty or not guilty. He clearly admitted that he did it. so why in the hell did he have a choice to plead either or?

What kind of judicial system is that? Pardon my ignorance but if he would have plead not guilty (after admitting that he did it) Isn't that perjury?

I mean the people he killed surly had no choice!

It SO infuriates me!!!!
Date: 2005-04-14 05:28 am (UTC)

From: [identity profile] kaylee.livejournal.com
minus the quote mark! :o

But ya know what I am saying?

Profile

andysocial: (Default)
andysocial

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 9th, 2026 03:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios